Systematic reviews of animal experiments.
نویسندگان
چکیده
There are strong scientific, ethical and legislative imperatives to replace animal experiments, rather than focusing efforts on improving them. Therefore, the Dr Hadwen Trust advocates that when systematic reviews identify weaknesses in animal experiments, the priority should be their replacement with more relevant non-animal methods. Individual researchers, universities, companies, funders and regulators should be working together to achieve this goal.
منابع مشابه
A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting.
To maximize the findings of animal experiments to inform likely health effects in humans, a thorough review and evaluation of the animal evidence is required. Systematic reviews and, where appropriate, meta-analyses have great potential in facilitating such an evaluation, making efficient use of the animal evidence while minimizing possible sources of bias. The extent to which systematic review...
متن کاملThe Usefulness of Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies
The question of how animal studies should be designed, conducted, and analyzed remains underexposed in societal debates on animal experimentation. This is not only a scientific but also a moral question. After all, if animal experiments are not appropriately designed, conducted, and analyzed, the results produced are unlikely to be reliable and the animals have in effect been wasted. In this ar...
متن کاملPublication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pre-clinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical care. Publication bias is one of the major threats of validity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Previous empirical studies suggested that systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become more prevalent until 2010 and found evidence for compromised met...
متن کاملSystematic reviews of animal experiments demonstrate poor human utility
The assumption that animal models are reasonably predictive of human outcomes provides the basis for their widespread use in toxicity testing, and in biomedical research aimed at developing cures for human diseases. To investigate the validity of this assumption, the comprehensive 'Scopus' biomedical bibliographic databases were searched for published systematic reviews of the human clinical or...
متن کاملDissemination Bias in Systematic Reviews of Animal Research: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews of preclinical studies, in vivo animal experiments in particular, can influence clinical research and thus even clinical care. Dissemination bias, selective dissemination of positive or significant results, is one of the major threats to validity in systematic reviews also in the realm of animal studies. We conducted a systematic review to determine the number of p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Lancet
دوره 360 9333 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002